摘要：Considering the high consumption of and preference for traditional treatments among people and the lack of enough studies on the effectiveness of these treatments, we aimed to review articles on the use of traditional and complementary medicine, focusing on how they affect healing, debridement, and hypertrophic scars. In this study, we conducted the literature search in international databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, as well as Persian databases Scientific Information Database (SID), Magiran, Iranmedex, and IranDoc. Retrieved hits were reviewed by three authors for screening based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the screening process is expressed as Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework flow chart. Twenty-two studies were included. The evaluated outcomes were wound healing in 19, pain control in 5, itching in 4, and scar appearance in 2 studies. All of the studies showed equal or improved effects compared to common treatments. Aloe vera, Centella asiatica, and Arnebia euchroma were the most common plants. We revealed that traditional medicine is beneficial in burn wound treatment. The diversity in ingredients that are used in traditional medicine brings up the need for further controlled prospective studies to evaluate the precise superiority of these treatments compared to standard care.

摘要：Method: Consecutive patients (n=105) with CPUs (n=218) treated at three different hospitals were randomized to receive Moist Exposed Burn Ointment (MEBO) dressings (Regenerative group, n=55 with 115 ulcers) or wet-to-moist saline dressings (Control group, n=50 with 103 ulcers). Data collected prospectively included demographics, clinical, biochemical and ulcer features. Ulcer surface area (SA) and healing index (HI) were calculated and compared at twoweek intervals for 12 weeks. Results: Sixty-one patients (58.1%) were male and 44 (41.9%) were female. Their mean age was 69.5 years. There was an increase in HI and reduction in SA starting at two and four weeks, respectively in the regenerative group. At 12 weeks, 61.7% (71/115) of ulcers treated with MEBO had complete healing (HI=1) versus 28.2% (29/103) of controls (p=0.000). None of the patients receiving MEBO had a HI of<0.5 at 12 weeks as compared to 25.2% of controls (p=0.000). Significantly (p<0.01) more grade 2-4 ulcers healed completely with MEBO by 12 weeks. No adverse effects or allergic reactions were noted by 12 weeks. Conclusion: In addition to its safety, MEBO significantly promotes the healing of CPUs with significant increase in HI of any given ulcer as early as two weeks of treatment, and significant reduction of ulcer SA starting at four weeks with complete healing of more than 60% of ulcers by 12 weeks.

摘要：Backgrounds: Burn, a damage and tissue loss caused by heat with a high morbidity and mortality, have a many variation and complex problem that require special management. After a period of shock, there were infections that threaten the burn patients. These hazards aggravate the wound to become wider, and it affects the mortality and the length of stay. That is why to reduce mortality rate and length of stay, we need a proper wound care.Methods:A retrospective descriptive studies was perform on 2b degree burn patients (20-25%) that treated with tangential excision and mebo or tangential excision and stsg. Data was taken from burns unit Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital in period of January to December 2011.Results: There were 30 patients (73.2%) that have been treat with tangential excision and mebo, and 11 patients (26.8%) that have been treat with tangential excision and stsg. The average length of stay for the tangential excision and mebo is 22.47 ? 23 days(SD 4.361), whereas patients with tangential excision and stsg is 15.82 ?16 days (SD 2.089). There were 8 patients (26.7%) with tangential excision and mebo that die, whereas patients with tangential excision and stsg were 2 patients (18.2%) that die. There were significant difference in the average length of stay (p = 0.018), but there was no difference in the proportion of patients dying status (P = 0.611).Conclusion:Wound care by tangential excision and stsg on 2b degree burn patient (20-25%), have a better outcome than patients treated by tangential excision and mebo.