摘要：目的:观察CO2点阵激光除痂疗法与早期耕耘疗法对中小面积深Ⅱ度烧伤创面痂皮的溶痂效果进行临床对比观察并总结经验。方法:在一个创面上分两处分别用CO2激光和耕耘疗法并配合湿润烧伤膏创面涂抹,隔日操作一次,共三次,后期规范化运用湿润烧伤膏,直至痂皮彻底溶解。结果:激光打孔后4h可见液化开始,24-48达到明显溶痂现象,经三次激光打孔后,8-10天溶痂过程结束。结论:运用点阵CO2激光溶痂速度和效果远远优于早期的耕耘疗法,明显缩短创面愈合时间,值得临床推广应用。 更多 还原 __vpn_eval__((function(){ AbstractFilter('ChDivSummary', 'ChDivSummaryMore', 'ChDivSummaryReset'); }).toString().slice(12, -2))

摘要：目的：分析痤疮凹陷性瘢痕采用CO2点阵激光综合模式联合湿润烧伤膏治疗的效果。方法：本研究主要的研究对象选取于本院收治的痤疮凹陷性瘢痕患者，共计36例，2020年1月至2022年1月为选取时间，总结所有患者的临床资料，并进行系统录入和划分，完成对比小组的建立，分组依据平均原则，每个小组分得18名患者。其中一组命名为研究组，使用CO2点阵激光综合模式联合湿润烧伤膏治疗。另一小组命名为参照组，使用点阵联合弗丽斯透明质酸钠医用敷料。治疗期间应用的方法存在差异，会产生不同的效果，因此对临床治疗效果进行对比，记录治疗前后两组的痤疮瘢痕权重评分，同时统计...

摘要：Background. To investigate the efficacy and safety of MEBO combined with Jinhuang powder for the treatment of diabetic foot with infection. Methods. From August 2015 to August 2019, patients with diabetic foot in our hospital were divided into the treatment group and control group. The treatment group was treated with moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) combined with Jinhuang powder, while the control group was treated with MEBO only. Results. After one week of treatment, the effective rate in the treatment group was 100%, and the effective rate in the control group was only 76%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The wound pain score was 2.40 ± 1.38 in the treatment group and 3.76 ± 1.85 in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). After one month of treatment, the effective rate of wound healing was 92.0% in the treatment group and 68% in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion. MEBO combined with Jinhuang powder is effective in treating diabetic foot with infection wound.

摘要：Aim. This study aimed to compare the effect of MEBO versus 0.2% hyaluronic acid gel (Gengigel?) applied to the palatal donor site on postoperative pain reduction and wound healing after free gingival graft harvesting. Methodology. Thirty-nine patients with different mucogingival defects were included in this study for harvesting a free gingival graft (FGG) for soft tissue augmentation. Patients were randomly assigned into three equal groups: group I (MEBO), group II (0.2% HA Gengigel?), and group III (control). Postoperative pain was recorded by using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Analgesic consumption was recorded for 7 days postoperatively. Wound size was measured at baseline and on days 3, 7, 14, and 21. Postoperative healing of the palatal wound was assessed by the VAS score for color match on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 42. Results. Results of this study showed significant postoperative pain reduction for the three groups; MEBO showed statistically significant less VAS score compared to the other two groups, while HA showed statistically significant less VAS score compared to the control group. Both MEBO and HA showed statistically significant less total analgesic consumption. No statistically significant difference was observed between groups for wound size. MEBO showed statistically significant higher VAS for color match. Conclusions. Both treatment modalities could reduce postoperative pain following harvesting of FGG and improve the palatal wound healing. However, MEBO showed better outcomes in terms of postoperative pain and color match.