摘要：目的在ICU(intensive care unit)患者的临床护理工作中,有效地预防、提前发现和解决患者皮肤问题是本文探讨的重点。方法加强对患者病情的观察、积极评估患者情况和采取有效的护理策略。结果减少了危重患者压疮的发生机率。结论有效地预防及应对ICU患者皮肤问题,做好皮肤护理是ICU整体医护策略中至关重要的组成部分。

摘要：目的:探讨ICU患者压疮及皮肤受损的护理措施及体会。方法:对本组患者创面采用预防及加强护理与美宝创疡贴换药治疗法相结合进行综合治疗。结果:Ⅱ度创面平均5天～7天愈合,Ⅲ度创面平均7天～10天愈合,Ⅳ度创面平均12天～30天愈合。结论:通过加强预防措施及基础护理,结合美宝创疡贴换药治疗,可有效防控创面感染,减少创面的再次损伤和疼痛,是创面愈合的重要保障。

摘要：Every year, millions of people experience burns, suffer from nonhealing wounds, or have acute wounds that become complicated by infection, dehiscence or problematic scarring. Effective wound treatment requires carefully considered interventions often requiring multiple clinic or hospital visits. The resulting costs of wound care are staggering, and more efficacious and cost-effective therapies are needed to decrease this burden. Unfortunately, the expenses and difficulties encountered in performing clinical trials have led to a relatively slow growth of new treatment options for the wound management. Research efforts attempting to examine wound pathophysiology have been hampered by the lack of an adequate chronic wound healing model, and the complexity of the wound healing cascade has limited attempts at pharmacological modification. As such, currently available wound healing therapies are only partially effective. Therefore, many new therapies are emerging that target various aspects of wound repair and the promise of new therapeutic interventions is on the immediate horizon.

摘要：In this study, we sought to test the medical efficacy of a Chinese medical herb product, moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO), on wound healing rate and infection control in burn injury. Standardized deep burn wounds were created on the back skin of rats by applying a hot brass bar for 12 to 18 seconds. MEBO was applied four times per day and compared with petroleum jelly, silver sulfadiazine, and dry exposure therapy. Under such a controlled setting, although MEBO had a better wound healing rate than the dry exposure treatment, it did not show the medical advantage statistically, as has been claimed, over the other two treatments (P > .05), either in terms of wound healing rate or bacterial control. We conclude that the MEBO is not suitable for deep burn wound treatment, particularly when infection is a concern.