摘要：目的 :观察美宝湿润烧伤膏 (MEBO) +胰岛素外涂对糖尿病皮肤溃疡创面的疗效。方法 :借鉴烧伤湿性疗法技术对 5 8例顽固性糖尿病皮肤溃疡创面全程采用MEBO +胰岛素外用治疗。结果 :创面逐渐愈合 ,皮肤光滑柔软 ,无瘢痕 ,肤色正常 ,无功能障碍 ,未见皮肤过敏现象。疗程 2周～ 2月。结论 :湿润烧伤膏 +胰岛素外用治疗糖尿病皮肤溃疡 ,能促进坏死创面上皮生长修复 ,抑制细菌生长繁殖 ,加速溃疡面愈合 ,方法简便 ,疗效显著。
摘要：目的：观察ＭＥＢＯ＋胰岛素外涂，对糖尿病患者深度烫伤创面的治疗效果。方法： ２例深Ⅱ度烫伤患者全程采用 ＭＥＢＯ＋胰岛素，治疗面积分别为 ３％～４％。结果：创面全部自行愈合，皮肤光滑、柔软无瘢痕，呈暗紫色，有毳毛生长，无功能障碍，疗程３０天～４０天。结论：湿性疗法技术十胰岛素外用治疗糖尿病深度烫伤，能促进上皮生长，抑制细菌繁殖，减少瘢痕形成，治疗方法简便易行，疗效显著。
摘要：Anal fissure is a common complication of the anorectal region and one of the most reported causes of anal pain. Acute anal fissure can be cured by surgery or medical treatment. There is an increase in the use of topical therapy for the treatment of anal fissures. A common topical drug used is Diltiazem (DTZ), a calcium-channel blocker, which relaxes the anal sphincter and thus promotes healing of the anal fissure. Moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) is an ointment that is effective for the treatment of burns and wound healing and is becoming popular in the treatment of anal fissures.
摘要：One hundred and thirty-eight (138) patients, with five hundred and sixty-six (566) different burn sites with different degrees, severity and locations, were enrolled to a multicenter clinical trial at 25 study centers. The goal of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of MEBO (Moist Exposed Burn Ointment) in the treatment of burn wound. Various parameters were studied including: (i) healing time, (ii) need for pain killers, (iii) consumption of i. v. Fluids, (iv) use of systemic antibiotics and (v) aesthetic appearance. There was remarkable decrease in the healing time and most patients either did not need any pain killer or were relieved with only mild analgesics, except in few cases of deep second degree and third degree burns. A decrease in the volume of i. v. fluids needed was also reported. Only 19% of cases developed clinical infection, especially in those who were not treated with MEBO immediately post burn. Even though systemic antibiotic treatment was prophylactically implemented in most cases as a routine measure, 32 cases did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis with MEBO and yet did not develop any infection. The aesthetic appearance reported was very acceptable. This treatment modality was not associated with any side effects, and patient discomfort during application and change was negligible. Thus, MEBO treatment was associated with excellent and relatively faster healing, low incidence of wound infection, and excellent patient compliance.