摘要：目的:探讨MEBO半暴露与INN促痂两种治疗方案对颜面部合并耳廓部位深度烧伤患者愈合效果、疼痛程度及炎性细胞因子的影响。方法:研究对象选取丽水市人民医院2014年3月-2016年3月收治颜面部合并耳廓部位深度烧伤患者共100例,以随机抽签法分为对照组(50例)和观察组(50例),分别采用INN促痂和MEBO半暴露疗法治疗;比较两组患者创面愈合效果,创面愈合时间,创面病原菌转阴换药次数,治疗前后VAS评分,TNF-α,IL-6及IL-8水平等。结果:观察组患者创面愈合效果显著优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者创面愈合时间和创面病原菌转阴换药次数均显著优于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者治疗后7d、14d及28dVAS评分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗后7d、14d及28dVAS评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者治疗后炎症细胞因子水平均显著高于治疗前(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗后炎症细胞因子水平均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:MEBO半暴露疗法治疗颜面部合并耳廓部位深度烧伤可有效促进创面愈合,减轻疼痛程度,并有助于下调炎性细胞因子水平,价值优于INN促痂疗法。

摘要：目的 比较凡士林(Vaseline)纱条、艾氟隆(Ivalon)膨胀海绵、湿润烧伤膏(MEBO)纱条三种鼻腔填塞方法用于控制急诊鼻出血的效果.方法 设立Vaseline组、Ivalon组、MEBO组做对照研究,观察控制急诊鼻出血止血的效果.观察48 h填塞期间患者出现的主要症状、评估疼痛程度、记录并发症情况.结果 三组在控制鼻出血的止血效果方面差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);48 h填塞期间患者出现的主要症状,Vaseline组和Ivalon组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),而MEBO组症状表现明显优于Vaseline组和Ivalon组(P＜0.05);鼻腔填塞和抽取鼻腔填塞物时疼痛分值Vaseline组和Ivalon组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),而M...

摘要：目的探讨三田汤外洗联合威伐光照射治疗难治性皮肤溃疡的临床疗效及安全性。方法选取广西壮族自治区皮肤病医院收治的难治性皮肤溃疡患者205例,采用随机数字表法分为观察组104例和对照组101例。对照组给予湿润烧伤膏外涂;观察组给予威伐光和自拟三田汤外洗。比较2组患者治疗前后视觉疼痛模拟量表(Visual analogue scale,VAS)评分及皮肤病生活质量指数(Dermatology life quality index,DLQI)评分、创面愈合时间及愈合率、活动自如程度及患者满意度、不良反应发生情况。结果治疗2周后,2组VAS及DLQI评分均较治疗前减少(P <0.05);治疗4周后,观察组VAS评分与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);治疗4周后,2组DLQI评分与治疗2周后比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.01);治疗4周后,观察组创面愈合平均时间短于对照组(P <0.05);治疗2、4周后,观察组愈合率高于对照组(P <0.05);治疗4周后,观察组患者活动自如程度好于对照组(P <0.05);治疗4周后,观察组患者满意度96.15%(100/104)高于对照组的85.15%(86/101)(P <0.05);观察组有5例出现轻微红斑,2例轻微灼热感;对照组有3例轻微涂药创口瘙痒。结论三田汤外洗联合威伐光照射治疗难治性皮肤溃疡能缩短创面愈合时间,提高愈合率,同时提高患者活动自如程度及患者满意度,临床安全有效。

摘要：Introduction The purpose of this manuscript is to investigate the treatment of skin soft tissue embolization or vascular occlusion after the injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) for Injection Rhinoplasty (IR) in Asians with a special interest in the time occurrence of the occlusion. Methods A total of 35 cases were evaluated after receiving HA injections for IR who presented with a vascular occlusive event. They were divided into three stages based on the time to embolization. Immediate, ≤5 hours; early, ≤3 days; and late, >3 days. There were two cases of immediate, 28 deemed early, and five late. Methods to prevent tissue necrosis are reviewed in the manuscript based on these stages. Results Skin color gradually recovered to normal after 11 treatments in 11 patients with mild embolization. No ischemic aggravation or skin necrosis was observed in 19 patients with moderate embolization; red scarring was seen in two and hypertrophic scar with uneven skin color in one patient. The five patients in the severe category had longer healing, more red scars, and more hypertrophic scarring. Conclusion The treatment of skin soft tissue embolization or vascular occlusion after HA IR in Asians can be effected by identifying the stage and degree of embolization and treating appropriately with the outlines presented in this manuscript.