摘要：Background The efficacy of pulsed dye laser combined (PDL) and UltraPulse fractional CO2 in treatment of hypertrophic scars is well documented. The present study investigates the efficacy of moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO)/moist exposed burn therapy (MEBT) in postlaser wound management. Methods Sixty-one patients with immature, red hypertrophic scars were enrolled in this clinical trial. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: (a) the MEBO treatment group (n = 30) and (b) the control group (n = 31) treated with chlortetracycline hydrochloride ointment. Demographic data such as age, gender, and cause of scars were recorded. A visual analogue score (VAS) was collected to measure pain at 1, 6, 24, 72 hours, and 7 days post-treatment. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used to determine the response of the scars before and 3 months after the treatment. The wound healing time and pigmentation scores were also recorded. Results No significant differences were found in age, gender, and etiology of the scars in the two groups. The VAS scores in MEBO group were significantly lower than the control group within the first 3 days after treatment. The wound healing time of the MEBO group was significantly shorter than the control group. For both groups, VSS scores were significantly decreased and the scar markedly improved. However, the VSS scores were significantly lower in the MEBO group compared with the control group 3 months after treatment and pigmentation formation was dramatically lower in MEBO group compared with the control. Conclusion MEBT/MEBO treatment reduced the post-treatment pain, shortened the wound healing duration, promoted the overall scar condition, and reduced the incidence of pigmentation.

摘要：Cutaneous delayed wounds are a challenging clinical problem, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) exhibit key roles in wound healing. Moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO), a Chinese burn ointment with a USA patented formulation, has been reported to promote chronic ischemic and neurogenic ulcer healing in patients; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In the present study, MEBO significantly promoted the formation of granulation tissue in cutaneous excisional wounds, shortened the time of wound healing, and increased neovascularization and the number of fibroblasts. Furthermore, as well as enhancing the protein expression, MEBO application also increased the gene expression of VEGF and bFGF. The results indicate that MEBO promotes cutaneous excisional wound healing by at least partially enhancing VEGF and bFGF production, implicating the potential uses of MEBO for delayed cutaneous wound healing.

摘要：Background:? Pressure ulcers often seriously affect the quality of life of patients. Moist Exposed Burn Ointment (MEBO) has been developed to treat patients with pressure ulcers. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MEBO in the treatment of pressure ulcers in Chinese patients. Methods:? Seventy-two patients with pressure ulcers were randomly assigned to 2 groups who received a placebo or MEBO for 2 months. The primary outcomes included the wound surface area (WSA) and pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH) tool. The secondary outcomes included a visual analog scale (VAS), questionnaire of ulcer status, and adverse effects. Results:? Sixty-seven patients completed the study. After 2 months of treatment, the difference of mean change from the baseline was greater for MEBO (vs placebo) for WSA mean (SD) ?6.0 (?8.8, ?3.3), PUSH Tool ?2.6 (?4.7, ?1.5), and VAS score ?2.9 (?4.4, ?1.7). On the basis of the questionnaire, the pressure ulcers were “completely healed” (50.0% vs 16.7%) (P < .05) in patients after 2 months of treatment with MEBO versus placebo. No major adverse effects were found in the 2 groups. Conclusion:? We showed that MEBO is effective and well tolerated for improving wound healing in Chinese patients with pressure ulcers.

摘要：目的:1.基于Meta分析探讨皮肤再生医疗技术(moist exposed burn therapy/moist exposed burn ointment,MEBT/MEBO)在慢性难愈合创面中的临床实践疗效,为其临床推广使用提供循证依据。2.通过运用MEBT/MEBO治疗慢性难愈合创面的临床观察,探讨其在创面修复中的临床疗效以及对患者生活质量的影响。方法:1.在中国知网(CNKI)、维普(VIP)、万方(Wanfang)、中国生物医学文献服务系统(NCBI)、Pub Med、Cochrane Library数据库查找以MEBT/MEBO疗法作为干预措施、以慢性难愈合创面为诊断、随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT)为研究方法的文献,时间从2012年1月起至2022年1月。主要结局指标包含完全治愈人数、治疗前后溃疡面积、创面完全愈合时间,次要观察指标各研究组给药频率、治疗周期、患者平均年龄。RCT质量评估分别由一名接受科研培训的专业人员与一名非专业人员在互不干扰情况下独立完成文献的研究方案及数据评分,若对筛选评估过程有争议,则由第三人员进行再次评估,最终得到初始数据。对符合纳入标准要求的文献按照观察结局指标提取数据后通过Review Manager 5.3和Stata17软件对最终纳入文献进行Meta分析。2.将60例患者按入组先后顺序进行编号,按随机数字表法将其分成治疗组(MEBO组)和对照组(贝复新组)各30例。观察两组治疗前、治疗28天后的日常生活活动能力、生活质量、情绪方面的得分,进而评价两种药物的疗效差异。结果:1.Meta分析结果:Meta分析最终纳入23篇文献,合并效应量后结果如下:(1)治疗组(湿润烧伤膏组)治疗慢性难愈合创面在总有效率、创面愈合时间、创面肉芽组织出现时间、创面愈合面积、创面愈合率、血管内皮生长因子(Vascular endothelial growth factor,VEGF)含量及表皮生长因子(Epidermal Growth Factor,EGF)含量、视觉模拟量表(Visual Analog Scale,VAS)评分等方面均优于对照组,疗效有统计学差异(P<0.01);(2)对照组在复发率方面较治疗组高(OR=0.36,95%CI为[0.16,0.82],Z=2.43,P=0.02);(3)治疗组在创面感染率低于对照组(OR=0.2...