摘要：目的:本文应用B超探测增生性瘢痕的厚度和增生性瘢痕与周围组织的粘连关系,拟探讨一种客观的、无创的疗效评价方法,了解多种方法联合治疗增生性瘢痕的疗效。方法:选用符合标准的140例患者作为观察组,并选取20例单纯应用压力疗法和30例压力疗法结合干扰素肌肉注射治疗的患者做为对照组。结果:本组140例患者中显效120例、有效20例、无效为0例,总有效率100%。单纯应用压力疗法以及应用压力+干扰素疗法的患者,显效和有效时间比美宝疤痕平+压力+干扰素疗法晚3个月。结论:B超测定显示全程应用美宝疤痕平后,瘢痕的厚度及与周围组织的粘连关系有明显的改善,并且感到舒适,关节功能活动度明显得到改善。
摘要：Burn injury is one of the most devastating injuries that may affect a patient. Even in economically deprived areas, burn care is largely driven by relatively plentiful resources equating quality of care with generous monitoring and clinical attention with little concern to management cost. Burn care costs have been the subject of very few investigations and are among the least studied by health services researchers. Nevertheless, it can be stated that local care of burn wounds accounts for a large proportion of the cost per day for treating patients. As economic times are changing and as market penetration of managed care contracts and stiff competition in the health care industry gains momentum, ways to reduce expenditures without adversely affecting the quality of care have become of primary importance. We report a randomized prospective comparative study analyzing the benefit-cost value of moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) application, an exposed method for burn wound care without the need for a secondary covering dressing, as compared to conventional closed methods.
摘要：Bart综合征又名先天性皮肤缺损症或皮肤再生不良。现报告1例bart综合征。患者男,新生儿。G2P1,胎龄36+2周,2600g。生后3小时发现左侧颈部、右侧肘部、双手、双下肢及阴囊大片皮肤缺失。并有甲缺失。住院期间反复出现呼吸暂停,血培养阳性,提示合并新生儿败血症。父母体健,否认近亲婚配及遗传性疾病。予抗感染治疗,贝复济喷雾剂、湿润烧伤膏等相关积极皮肤护理,温箱保温,给予血浆支持治疗,皮肤创面逐渐结痂自愈较前缓解。Bart综合征遗传性大疱表皮松解症的一种亚型,较为罕见。对于大面积皮肤缺损者护理较为困难,应精心保护创面、保持体温,并积极控制及预防感染。
摘要：Objective: The goal of any topical formulation is efficient transdermal delivery of its active components. However, delivery of compounds can be problematic with penetration through tough layers of fibrotic dermal scar tissue.Approach: We propose a new approach combining high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Raman spectroscopy (RS) using a topical of unknown composition against a well-known antiscar topical (as control).Results: Positive detection of compounds within the treatment topical using both techniques was validated with mass spectrometry. RS detected conformational structural changes; the 1,655/1,446?cm?1 ratio estimating collagen content significantly decreased (p?<?0.05) over weeks 4, 12, and 16 compared with day 0. The amide I band, known to represent collagen and protein in skin, shifted from 1,667 to 1,656?cm?1, which may represent a change from β-sheets in elastin to α-helices in collagen. Confirmatory elastin immunohistochemistry decreased compared with day 0, conversely the collagen I/III ratio increased in the same samples by week 12 (p?<?0.05, and p?<?0.0001, respectively), in keeping with normal scar formation. Optical coherence tomography attenuation coefficient representing collagen deposition was significantly decreased at week 4 compared with day 0 and increased at week 16 (p?<?0.05).Innovation: This study provides a platform for further research on the simultaneous evaluation of the effects of compounds in cutaneous scarring by RS and HPLC, and identifies a role for RS in the therapeutic evaluation and theranostic management of skin scarring.Conclusions: RS can provide noninvasive information on the effects of topicals on scar pathogenesis and structural composition, validated by other analytical techniques.